The two tribes were evidently a primitive race which was spread over the whole of India, as they are still found in large numbers in Kajputana and Guzarat, where they are known as Bhils and Meenas, and in the Canarese country, where they are called Billavar.

Villavar

Villavars were the primary rulers among the Dravidians who once ruled the whole of India.

Villavars(Bowmen) were archers who once emerged from the hunting clans of India. They were also known as Ezhinar or Eyinars in Chera(Present day Kerala) and Tamil countries respectively. The Bhil tribals, The Billavas of Tulunadu of Karnataka, The Villavar Clans of Kerala who founded the Chera Kingdom all are Villavars. The Ezhavas or Illavas of Kerala are also descendents of this Villavar tribe of Kerala. The Villavars of Kerala and Illavars of Sri Lanka after whom Eeelam or Heladipa is named were relatives. Alwar, Alvar, Aluvar or Alva are the titles shared by all the Villavar tribes.

Villavar was a tribe of hunters living in the southern part of ancient India. The word villavar derives from the Dravidian word for bow (vil). The villvars lived in hill tracts and forests; ^[1]. Chera kings used the title villavan^[2][3]

References

V. Kanakasabhai (1904). The Tamils Eighteen Hundred Years Ago. Asian Educational Services. p. 39. ISBN978-81-206-0150-5.

Hudson, D. Dennis (25 September 2008). The Body of God: An Emperor's Palace for Krishna in Eighth-Century Kanchipuram. Oxford University Press. ISBN9780190451400.

Aiyangar, Sakkottai Krishnaswami (2004). Ancient India: Collected Essays on the Literary and Political History of Southern India. Asian Educational Services. ISBN 9788120618503.

Original page from book

by V. Kanakasabhai (1904). The Tamils Eighteen Hundred Years Ago.

CHAPTER IV 

Tamil Races and Tribes. 

The oldest of tribes who dwelt in Tamilakam were the 
Villavar and Minavar. The • Villavar or bowmen (from the 
Dravidian word ml meaning a bow) inhabited hilly tracts and 
jungles, and lived by the chase; and the Minavar or fishermen 
(from the Dravidian meen, a fish) subsisted by fishing and resided 
in the valleys and plains, or on the sea-coast. The two tribes 
were evidently a primitive race which was spread over the whole 
of India, as they are still found in large numbers in Kajputana 
and Guzarat, where they are known as Bhils and Meenas, and in 
the Canarese country, where they are called Billavar. 

These semi-barbarous tribes were conquered by the Nagas, 
who were a very numerous and civilised race, and who at one 
time or other ruled a great portion of India, Ceylon and Burma. 
They are mentioned in the Bamayana, and the Naga capital, 
which probably lay in the heart of the Dekkan is described in 
that epic as follows:— 

Near Bhogavati stands the place 
Where dwell the hosts of the serpent race, 

A broad-wayed city walled and barred 
Which watchful legions keep and guard. 

The fiercest of the serpent youth 
Each awful for his venomed tooth ; 

And throned in his imperial hall 
Is Vasuki who rules them all. 

Explore the serpent city well, 

Search town and tower and citadel, 

Scan each field and wood that lies 
Around it with your watchful eyes. 

From the Maliabharata we learn that there were Naga 
kingdoms between the Jumna and the Ganges about the 13th 
century B. C. When the kings of the Lunar race of Aryas 
wanted to found a second capital near the spot where Delhi 
stands at present, they had to dislodge the Nagas who occupied 

1. Griffith's Bamayana IV, 205. Indian Antiquary, Vol. VIII. p. 5. 



40 


The Tamils Eighteen Hundred Years Ago 


it. Arjuna, the hero of the poem, in his banishment is said to 
have married first Ulipi, the daughter of a Naga king, then 
Chitrangadai, daughter of Chitravahana, the Naga king of 
Manipura. Parikshit, the grand son of Arjuna was killed by 
Thakshaka, a Naga king, and hence Janamejaya, the son of 
Parikshit had to wage a long and bloody war with the Nagas and 
killed thousands of them. They appear again in history in the 
6th century B. C. When a Naga dynasty ruled Magadha ; and it 
was during the reign of Ajatasatru, the 6th king of this race, 
that Gautama Buddha preached his new faith which soon found 
favour with the Nagas. 1 The Ceylonese historical works all begin 
with an account of the Nagas. It appears from these works 
that in the 6th century B. C. there were powerful Naga king¬ 
doms on the western coast of the island which was called 
Nagadwipa or Naga island on that account. The Naga capital 
was at Kalyani. The niece of the king of Kalyani was married 
to a Naga king of the Kanawaddamano mountain, which was 
evidently Kandamadanam, a hill near the modern Ramesvaram 
on the Indian coast, opposite to Kalyani. In the ancient sculp¬ 
tures at Amaravati and elsewhere which were executed more 
than eighteen hundred years ago, the human figures, which are 
represented with serpent hoods spread wide at the back of them, 
are Nagas. 2 Some fragments of the sculptures which were 
removed from the ruins at Amaravati may now be seen at the 
Government Museum, Madras. In these sculptures the Naga 
kings are distinguished by the hood of a five or seven-headed 
serpent at their back, Naga princesses by a three-headed serpent, 
and ordinary Nagas by a single-headed serpent. The artists who 
executed these sculptures with considerable labour and care seem 
to have imagined that the Nagas partook of the nature of 
serpents, and that their bodies were partly human and partly 
serpentine. The ancient Tamil poets appear to have shared this 
belief, for, they speak of the Nagas who were contemporary with 
them, as human beings, while at the same time they describe the 
ancient Nagas as serpents living underground. In describing the 
antiquity and wealth of Kaviripaddinam, the Chola capital, the 
author of the Chillappathikaram states that it was an ancient 

THE NAGAS

NAGA TRIBE: ANCESTOR  SKULL
HUMAN SKULL, HAIR, PIGMENT, WOOD



THE NAGA TRIBE, FROM NAGALAND, PLACE
DEAD ANCESTORS SKULLS IN SHRINES.

The aboriginal Villavar and Minavar appear to have had 
no gods. The Nagas who first conquered the aboriginal races, 
which inhabited the Tamil country, worshipped the dread goddess 
K&li and sacrificed many a buffalo at her shrines. The image of 
KAli was decked in a most frightful manner. Her matted hair 
was tied up like a crown on her head, with the shining skin, 
•of a young cobra : the curved tusk of a boar was fastened in her 
hair to resemble the crescent. A string of tiger’s teeth served 
as a necklace on her shoulders. The striped skin of a tiger was 
wound round her waist like a garment. A strong bow bent 
^tnd ready to shoot was placed in her hand; and she was 

Vaivasvata, also known as Sraddhadeva or Satyavrata or MANU , was the king of Dravida before the great flood

Dravida is mentioned as one of the kingdoms in the southern part of present-day mainland India during the time of the Mahabharata. Sometimes the name Dravida was used to denote all the southern kingdoms (like the Chera, Pandya and Chola kingdoms) collectively^[

The king of Dravida Kingdom ?

The origin of Dravida

Mahabharata links the origin of Dravidas with sage Vasistha. Viswamitra, a king in the Ikshwaku clan, attacked the cow of Vasistha. Then many armies emerged for the protection of that cow and they attacked the armies of Viswamitra. Cow symbolizes land, in ancient Indian scriptures. Thus this war was fought with the countries allied with Vasistha.Other kingdoms that were mentioned along with the Dravidas in this incident were Sakas, Yavanas, Savaras, Kanchis, Paundras and Kiratas, Nishada, Yavanas and Sinhalas, and the barbarous kingdoms of Khasas, Chivukas, Pulindas, Chinas Hunas with Keralas, Mlechchhas, etc.THE JANAPATHAS AND KINGDOMS OF SOUTH INDIA There are many Janapathas and kingdoms in the southern region of India, referred to in the Mahabharata. Most of these Janapadas are named after the community inhabiting them or vice versa. Some purar:ias, like the Matsya and the Vayu, rightly consider the Narmada and Mahanadi axis as the dividing line between Northern and Southern India and include the Tapti basin within the Southern region. Tittirah These people, mentioned in the Mahabharata, are found in the army of Yuddhisthar along with many north-western tribes. According to Shefer, on the evidence of Matsya puran, they are a Dravidian people of the region adjacent to the Chola and Pandays terntones. Reference P225 shodhganga ch5

Vedic Arctic Home by nindi punj

FRONT page of book

Satyavrata or Manu king of The dravida Kingdom (8th line from last)

Advanced History Of India by Srinivasa Iyengar P. T

5th line from last

Advanced History Of India
by
Srinivasa Iyengar P. T

Abraham and Brahma

In religio-mythology, Abraham and Brahma, aka the “Abraham/Brahma motif” (Goodman, 1994), Brahma and Abraham, or Abraham = Brahma (Ѻ), refers to multiply overlapping parallels between the Hebrew patriarch figure Abraham (500BC) and the Hindu creator god Brahma (900BC), and their respective wife-sisters Sarah and Saraswati (see: Sarah and Saraswati); both sets of which derive from the older Egyptian astro-theology coupling of Ra/Sirius (c.3500BC), i.e. Sun-Star based theology

A diagram of the Abraham and Brahma connection from a chapter of Libb Thims' Zerotheism for Kids (2016), explaining how Abraham and Brahma, and Sarah and Saraswati, are not real people (nor gods), but anthropomorphism of an ancient astro-theological belief of the connection of the sighting of helical rising of Sirius, the start of the annual Nile River flood, and the re-powering of the sun. [13]

Abraham & Brahma | pre-Rosetta Stone era

In c.1000 to 500BC, it was known that Jewish priests were of Egyptian origin; for example:

“The ‘Choens’ [Cohens] (Ѻ) are most senior Egyptian priest-teachers.”

— Herodotus (c.450BC) [15]

Hence, it would have been known that the fictional prophet "Abraham" would be of Egyptian origin, in derivation. In the years to follow, however, with the decline of the Egyptian Empire

The Egyptian language and religion became less well known; accordingly scholars began to attribute Abraham to an Indian origin; for example:-

“ ‘This man’, answered Aristotle, ‘was by birth a Jew, and came from Celesyria; these Jews are descended from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians Calani’.”

— Josephus (c.90AD), Selected Works (pg. 65) (Ѻ)

See HISTOMAP

Accordingly, in the years c.500BC to 1820s, prior to the making (189BC), later discovery (1799), and translation (1820) of the famed tri-lingual Rosetta stone, the key to understanding Egyptian hieroglyphics, and theological system, of the Egyptians, this language conveys, decoded in preliminary form dissection (1840s-1870s), then later in more refined form (1910s-1920s), there was no way for an intelligent person, e.g. Voltaire or Kant, to be able to discern that Hinduism (900BC) and Judaism (500BC) are both derived from ancient Egyptian religio-mythology (3100BC), itself based an ancient astro-theology. Accordingly, thinkers in this general era, if they noticed Abraham = Brahma connection, generally had no choice, per reason of lack of better data, but to conclude that Abraham derived from the Brahma model of the Hindus. This is what we call the "pre-Rosetta Stone era". In the "post-Rosetta Stone era", in the late 19th century (c.1870s-present), it became clear that both Abraham and Brahma were independently copied from the older Sun-Sirius + Nile River flood theological cyclical model, which turned Ra-Isis + Nun god model, which morphed into the reincarnation-based Hindu version and the resurrection based Jewish-Christian-Islam version, respectively.

The following are pre-Rosetta Stone era, i.e. before 1870s, related Abraham and Brahma connecting quotes, made in the period when Egyptian hieroglyphics were either not yet understood (pre 1820s), or there meaning was just beginning to be disseminated (1840s-1870s):

“‘Abraham’ and his wife ‘Sarah’ are derived from ‘Brahma’ and his wife ‘Saraswati’.”

— Constantin Volney (1791), The Ruins (pg. #); Nigel Leask (2004) truncated (pg. 105) version

People from this camp, in short, will tend to argue that Judaism was copied from Hinduism and the Jewish priests originally Indian priests, which is an incorrect view.

“The names Abram and Brahma are equivalent in numerical value.”
— Charles King (1864), The Gnostics and Their Remains, Ancient and Mediaeval (pg. 13)

Abraham, Brahma & Ra | post-Rosetta Stone era

The following are post-Rosetta Stone era, i.e. after 1870s, related Abraham and Brahma connecting quotes, during which time it began to become apparent that Ra (sun) and Isis (Sirius), sun-star based Egyptian mythology (3100BC), rooted ancient astro-theology (3500BC), predates both Babylonian mythology (2300BC), Persian mythology (1100BC), Hindu mythology (c.900BC), and Hebrew mythology, therein being the determinate original source of the Brahma/Saraswati, Abraham/Sarah commonalities:

A 1912 etymology of Abraham, as "father Ra, born of earth, at is fire city", by American comparative mythologist Wakeman Ryno, who is explicitly defined as a solar-astrological based fictional character. [2]

“The fire-god of Ur was Ab-Ram. The Hebrew world ‘Ab’ means ‘father’, and Ram (head sign of the Zodiac) means ‘most high’. Ab-Ram and Is-Ra-El were names of Saturn.”

— Samuel Dunlap (1858), Vestiges of theSpirit History of Man; cited by Hilton Hotema (1956)[6]

“So Ab, the original, Ram, or due east point, the orient, or origin of all light, or Braam of Sanscrit, by disguising its true meaning and mystifying the multitude by inserting at the proper place this H converted Abraam into Ab-ra-ham, or Ab, the first, original, Ra, the father or sun god, and Ham the Egyptian founder; or God the father of Ham.”

— Karl Anderson (1892), The Astrology of the Old Testament [1]

“Here Adam and Eve (Earth and Sky, Sibu and Nuit) mourned their first born Abel (summer), who had been killed by his brother Cain (lance). with the lance-like frosts of win-ter. Here Abraham (Ab-RA-Ham, father Ra at his Fire-City) mourned his father Terah (Earth). Here is where the God Saturnus mourned his mother Terra (Earth). Here is the dark abyss of Tartarus where Cronus receives his scythe. Here is the Ur of Chaldees, where Old Father Time cuts off the year with his sickle.”

— Wakeman Ryno (1912), “Comparative Mythology” [2]

In 1956, Hilton Hotema, in his Ancient Sun God, building on Samuel Dunlap (1858), devoted an entire chapter to “Ab-Ram the Sun-God”; a synopsis his views from one of his later books is as follows:

“The story of Abraham is a myth. Abraham himself is a myth. It was usual with the Old Arabians to regard Satum and Abram as their progenitor, and while looking upon Saturn as their father ... He was a child named Ab-ram, and this name is later changed to Ab-ra-ham. Charles King in his work, The Gnostics, states that the words "brahma" and "abrahrn" have the same numerical value. When we run this ‘allegory’ down, we discover that Abram (Abraham) is just another myth of the sun

— Hilton Hotema (1963), The Secret of Regeneration [3]

The following are post-Rosetta Stone era etymologies, making the Brahma = Abraham connection, but remaining ignorant as to the older "father Ra born of Keme" following the annual 150-day Nile River flood marked by the helical rising of Sirius (Sarah/Saraswati) etymology:

“Abram is but the Hindu Brama, with a as prefix instead of suffix; and Brama was the original name of the Hindu creator. Later the letter h was added, thus making it Brahma. The letter h signifies life, and thus did Brama, Abram, and Sarai in due time receive life, or being, which implies that in the beginning they did not have it.”

— Lloyd Graham (1975), Deceptions and Myths of the Bible [4]

“There are certain striking similarities between the Hindu god Brahma and his consort Saraisvati, and the Jewish Abraham and Sarai, that are more than mere coincidences.”
— Gene Matlock (c.2002), “Who Was Abraham?”[9]

“The similarities between Abraham and Brahma have not gone unnoticed. Abraham is said to be the father of the Jews, and Brahma, as the first created being, is often seen as the father of mankind. Abraham’s name is derived from the two Semitic words ab meaning ‘father’ and raam/raham meaning ‘of the exalted….’ We might also note that the name of Brahma’s consort Sarasvati seems to resonate with that of Abraham’s wife, Sarah [… each one’s identity as a wife and/or sister]. Also, in India, the Sarasvati River includes a tributary known as the Ghaggar…. According to Jewish tradition, Hagar was Sarah’s maidservant…. Both Brahmins … and Jews see themselves as the ‘chosen people of God.’ The Hebrews began their sojourn through history as a ‘kingdom of priests’ (Exodus 19:6). Likewise, Brahmins are also a community of priests. ”
— Steven Rosen (2006), Essential Hinduism [5]

“Brahma, the Hindu God of Creation, is Abraham. Sarasvati, the Hindu Goddess of knowledge and wisdom and consort to Brahma, is Sarah, Abraham's wife. I first came across the idea that Abraham and Brahma might be connected around 1999 but can't remember exactly where I saw it other than remembering doing an internet search on something and coming up with a site with this information. The site I think also connected Hammarabi to Abraham to Brahma as all variants of the same person. In Hebrew, the names for Brahma and Abraham would be written the same way: BRHM, with the vowels excluded. But Krishna sounds and looks like Christ, so what of the similarity? And I put this information on my mental back burner until debating with Muslims on internet talkboards several years later and again ran across another Abraham-Brahma connection checking out some Hindu Vedic sites countering Islamic doctrines. Abraham is the Brahma of the South. The Brahma of Egypt, the Black Brahma. The Saturn Brahma. Osiris is the Sun Brahma. Hindu Vedic merchants were trading spices heavily with Egypt and Canaan through the Yemen-Sabeans who are linguistically and culturally connected to Canaanite Hebrews. At some point ancient Hebrews picked up both Egyptian royalty racism and Vedic Brahmin ideas such as the whole "Priests of God" racial prejudice against Gentiles seen as inferior human beings just as Brahmins considered other castes less than themselves. The End of Abraham chapter tells more about how Jewish authors plagiarized Hindu Vedic religious personages, Brahma and Sarasvati, to create Abraham and Sarah.”
— Stephen Lewis (2007), Biomystical Christianity [7]

References
1. Anderson, Karl. (1892). The Astrology of the Old Testament: Lost World Regained (pg. 10). Health Research Books, 1996.
2. Ryno, Wakeman. (1912). “Comparative Mythology” (Ѻ), The American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal, 34:41-46.
3. Hotema, Hilton. (1963). The Secret of Regeneration (§: Allegory of Abram (Abraham), pgs. 136-37). Health Research Books, 1998.
4. Graham, Lloyd M. (1975). Deceptions and Myths of the Bible (pg. 113). Citadel Press Books.
5. (a) Rosen, Steven. (2006). Essential Hinduism (pg. 12). Greenwood Publishing Group.
(b) Murdock, Dorothy. (2009). The Gospel According to Acharya S (pg. 70). Stellar House Publishing.
(c) Rainbow Warrior. (2014). “Brahma and Abraham: Divine Covenants of a Common Origin” (Ѻ), Academia.edu.
6. (a) Dunlap, Samuel F. (1858). Vestiges of the Spirit History of Man (Ra, 19+ pgs; Brahma, 24+ pgs; Abraham, 15+ pgs; Ab-Ram, 7+ pgs). Publisher.
(b) Hotema, Hilton. (1956). Ancient Sun God (pg. 26). Publisher.
7. Lewis, Stephen. (2007). Biomystical Christianity (bio; Egyptian Connection; End of Abraham). BioMystic.org.
8. (a) Doreste, Tomas. (1998). Moisés y los Extraterrestres. Group Edit. Planeta.
(b) Matlock, Gene. (c.2002). “Who Was Abraham?”(Ѻ). Hermetics.org.
9. Matlock, Gene. (c.2002). “Who Was Abraham?”(Ѻ). Hermetics.org.
10. (a) Postel, Guillaume. (1552). Abrahami patriarchae liber Jezirah. Publisher.
(b) Robertson, John. (1889), Christ and Krishna (pg. 6). Publisher.
(c) Bouwsma, William J. (1957). Concordia Mundi: the Career and Thought of Guillaume Postel (1510-81) (pg. 61). Harvard University Press.
(d) Goodman, Hananya. (1994). Between Jerusalem and Benares: Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism (pg. 270). SUNY Press, 2012.
11. Goodman, Hananya. (1994). Between Jerusalem and Benares: Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism (pg. 4). SUNY Press, 2012.
12. (a) Poliakov, Leon. (1974). The Aryan Myth (translator: Edmund Howard)(pg.186). Basic Books.
(b) Goodman, Hananya. (1994). Between Jerusalem and Benares: Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism (pg. 270). SUNY Press, 2012.
(c) Cowan, Robert. (2010). The Indo-German Identification: Reconciling South Asian Origins and European Destines, 1765-1885 (pg. 52). Camden House.
(d) Agarwai, M.K. (2013). The Vedic Core of Human History (pg. 322). iUniverse.
13. Thims, Libb. (2016). Smart Atheism: For Kids (pdf | 309-pgs). Publisher.
14. Pliny (the Elder). (77AD). Natural History, Volume 1 (translators: John Bostock and H.T. Riley) (pg. 67). Henry G. Bohn, 1855.
15. Gordon, J.S. (2011). Land of the Fallen Star Gods: the Celestial Origins of Ancient Egypt (pg. #). Inner Traditions.

Further reading
● Rainbow Warrior. (2014). “Brahma and Abraham: Divine Covenants of a Common Origin” (Ѻ), Academia.edu.

source and explanation

4.6 billion years:

The Sun formed from the gravitational collapse of a region within a large molecular cloud. Most of the matter gathered in the center (Sun), while the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune).Sun was about 70% as bright as today.Our solar system is currently orbiting at around 24,000–26,000 light-years from the galactic center of the Milky Way, completing one orbit in about 225–250 million years.The distance of the Sun from Earth is approximately 149.6-million kilometers. At this average distance, light travels from the Sun to Earth in about 8 minutes and 19 seconds.

Formation Of Universe

Detailed study about Ancient Ancestro's Ancestor , How they became human and then God ,

source

Evolution of God (Human)

Homo erectus

derives from early Homo or late Australopithecus. From its earliest appearance, H. erectus (in Africa also known as

Homo ergaster) is distributed in East Africa and Southwest Asia. H. erectus later migrates throughout Eurasia, and is described in a number of subspecies.^[31] H. erectus is also the first known species to develop control of fire, by about 1.5 Ma.Evolution of dark skin at about 1.2 Ma.^[32]

Homo sapiens.

Modern human presence in East Africa (Gademotta), at 276 kya.

1.Homo sapiens

NOW See how Earth Became inhabitant For God and Human

Homo sapiens is the only extant human species. The name is Latin for "wiseman"

SAGES - WISE MAN Ancient Ancestors Title

The Seven Sages or Seven Wise Men , was the title For seven philosophers, statesmen, and law-givers of the 6th century BC who were renowned for their wisdom.

wise men is used for sages , because sages are those who discover and give the knowledge to human like economy , finance , math , language , vedas , etc 

THE living Homo sapiens IS "AKHA" Thailand ,The Akha are an ethnic group who live in small villages at higher elevations in the mountains of Thailand

A Burmese depiction of the Akha in the early 1900s

2.HOMO ERECTUS (its before Sepiens)

Homo erectus (meaning 'upright man') is a species of archaic humans that lived throughout most of the Pleistocene geological epoch

Female Homo erectus , one of the first truly human Ancient ancestors of modern humans.

Forensic reconstruction of an adult male Homo erectus.

Origin and dispersal

The Narmada fossil, discovered in 1982 in Madhya Pradesh, India, was at first suggested as H. erectus (Homo erectus narmadensis) but later recognized as Homo sapiens.^[112]

enlarge
Map of the distribution of Middle Pleistocene (Acheulean) cleaver finds

Control of fire by early humans homo erectus

A diorama showing Homo erectus, the earliest human species that is known to have controlled fire

The control of fire by early humans was a turning point in the cultural aspect of human evolution. Fire provided a source of warmth, protection, a way to create more advanced hunting tools, and a method for cooking food. These cultural advances allowed human geographic dispersal, cultural innovations, and changes to diet and behavior. Additionally, creating fire allowed human activity to continue into the dark and colder hours of the evening.

NOW,

Homo erectus use fire and this is a revolutionary invention of human , now H. erectus start Migration  and that's how the first GOD is Created called The SUN or surya , fire , agni devi , energy , positive vibes , and all , H.erectus use fires to protect humans from wild animals and they cook food for those human who didn't know about fire and hence  they give the title of GOD (g) discovery of fire is a man , society make him GOD .

How could humans have evolved and still be in the “Image of God”?

to be continouee from copy pink homini timeline ........

The ancestors of Lord Ram : are described below according to Vishnu Purana and Valmiki Ramayana. The famous personalities of Suryavansha as per Vishnu Purana, Valmiki Ramayana, Ramakatha Rasavahini and Raghuvansha Charitram are Ikshvaku(son of manu ), Vikukshi, Kakusta, etc. The city of Kosala and Ayodhya was founded by Manu (earliest Prajapathi) and by his son Ikshvaku whose descendant was Ram.

1. Brahma
2. Marichi
3. Kashyapa
4. Vivasvan (Surya)
5. Shraddhadeva Manu

dravidian king manu - ikshvaku-ram

from the information and data we can say that the king of the dravida kingdom is MANU (shraddhadeva , satyavrata, vavivasvata manu) and his son IKSHVAKU whose descendant was RAM.

let's go through some more facts and info

As it's clearly show that rama and ikshvaku had a connection , Genealogy connection which clearify that rama is Dravidian not aryan

MANU AND HIS CONNECTION WITH AKKADA (THE UNKNOW CITY) AND CONNECTION WITH ATLANTIS CIVILIZATION

(1)S'rî S'uka said: 'After Sudyumna, thus had disappeared, Vaivasvata Manu, his father desiring a(nother) son, executed austerities at the Yamunâ for a hundred years. (2) After for the purpose of offspring having worshiped the Godhead, Lord Hari, Manu begot ten sons who were like him and of whom the eldest was named Ikshvâku [see also 8.13: 2-3]. (3)Prishadhra was among the sons of Manu by his guru ordered to herd cows. For that purpose he had taken the vow of vîrâsana ['tostand prepared with a sword'] to protect them at night [see also 4.6: 38]. (4) One night when it was raining, a tiger entered the land of the cowshed. Out of fear all the cows lying down, got up and spread all around the field. (5-6) When the strong animal seized one of the cows, it began to cry out of distress and fear. Prishadhra, hearing the screaming, took his sword and hastily followed the sound, but because the clouds covered the stars that night, he mistook the cow for the tiger and by mistake cut off its head. (7) The tiger, also being hit by the sword, had its ear cut off and fled most afraid, leaving a blood trail.(8) Prishadhra thinking that he had killed the tiger, to his dismay discovered the next

Puranas In The Light Of Modern Science
by
Aiyar, K. Narayanaswami

Puranas In The Light Of Modern Science
by
Aiyar, K. Narayanaswami

morning that he being a hero, with his sword had killed the cow. (9) The family preceptor [Vasishthha] cursed him for the unintended sinful deed saying: 'Having acted like a s'ûdra, you cannot belong to the kshatriyas. Because of that unholy deed it is your karma to become a s'ûdra.' (10) The hero thus being cursed by his guru, accepted the words with folded hands and took the vow of celibacy the way the sages want it. (11-13) Exclusively devoted to Vâsudeva, the Supreme Lord and Soul of all, the Transcendence and Purity in person, he was equal and kindhearted towards all living beings. Freed from attachments, peaceful within and self-controlled, he was, free from possessions, of a vision in which he could accept whatever that was available for his physical needs, the way it for the benefit of the soul was arranged by His grace. Always with his mind focussed on the Supreme Self within and thus fully absorbed being satisfied in spiritual realization, he traveled all over the earth appearing to others as if he were deaf, dumb and blind. (14) After thus being engaged, he entered the forest and, as a saint, achieved the ultimate transcendental goal the moment he out there ran into a forest fire that he allowed to consume himself [see also B.G. 4: 9].

Third
revised
edition, loaded October 15, 2019.

click here to zoom in family tree of manu and others

(15)Another son, Kavi [or Vasumân], the youngest one, had no attachments to material pleasures. After giving up his father's kingdom along with his friends, he, still a young man, entered the forest and reached the transcendental world by always keeping the effulgent Supreme Person in his heart.

(16)From the son of Manu Karûsha [or Tarûsha] there was a dynasty of kshatriyas called the Kârûshas who, as kings of the northern realm, were highly religious protectors of the brahminical culture.

(17)From Dhrishtha [or Shrishtha] a caste of kshatriyas originated who, in the world having achieved the position of brahmins, were named the Dhârshthas. From Nriga there was the succession of first Sumati, Bhûtajyoti and thereafter Vasu. (18) From Vasu's son Pratîka there was one named Oghavân ['the uninterrupted tradition'] who fathered another son named Oghavân who had a daughter who also carried that name: Oghavatî. She married with Sudars'ana.

(19)From Narishyanta there was Citrasena, Riksha was his son and he begot Mîdhvân. Mîdhvân's son was Pûrna and Indrasena was Pûrna's son. (20) Because of Indrasena there was Vîtihotra, from him there was Satyas'ravâ, Urus'ravâ was his son and Devadatta was his son. (21) Devadatta's son became the most powerful Agnives'ya, who was Agni in person. He was a mahârishi, a great saint,also known as Kânîna and Jâtûkarnya. (22) From Agnives'ya a dynasty of brahmins came forth known as the Âgnives'yâyanas. Oh King, I have thus described the descendants of Narishyanta, let me now tell you about Dishtha's dynasty.

(23-24)Dishtha's son was Nâbhâga

. He, by contrast, answered to the vocation of the vais'yas

. His son was Bhalandana and from him there
was
Vatsaprîti. His son was named Prâms'u and Pramati was his son. Khanitra is known as Pramati's
successor. He in his turn was succeeded by Câkshusha and his son
was Vivims'ati. (25)
Vivims'ati's son was Rambha and his son, Khanînetra, was
most religious. From him there was the scion
Karandhama, oh great King. (26) Avîkshit














was his son and his son,
Marutta, became
emperor. The great mystic Samvarta, the son of Angirâ, engaged
him in performing a yajña. (27) The like of
Marutta's sacrifice has never been observed since, because all that he
used was made
of gold and everything that he had was of the greatest beauty. (28) Indra was delighted to
drink
the soma-rasa,
the brahmins were generously compensated, the Maruts [the demigods of the wind] offered
foodstuffs, and all the gods of the universe were part of the
assembly. (29) Dama
was Marutta's son and from him
there was
a son with the power to expand the kingdom: Râjyavardhana. From
his
son Sudhriti a son was born named Nara. (30) Nara's
son was called Kevala and he fathered
Dhundhumân. Vegavân was there because of him and Vegavân's
son Budha had
Trinabindu for his son who was a great king. (31) Alambushâ
accepted
him
as
her
husband.
She
was
an
adorable
goddess,
a
girl
from
heaven
and
a
reservoir
of all good qualities, who gave birth to a couple of sons
and a
daughter named Ilavilâ. (32) Vis'ravâ,
was
a
saint
and
master
of
yoga.
He
received
transcendental
knowledge
from
his
father
and
begot Kuvera in Ilavilâ: he who brings wealth. (33) Vis'âla,
S'ûnyabandhu
and
Dhûmraketu
were
the
sons
of Trinabindu. Vis'âla built a city named Vais'âlî and founded  a dynasty.  (34) Hemacandra
was
his
son
who
fathered
one
called
Dhûmrâksha.
From
his
son
Samyama
there
were

Kris'âs'va and Devaja. (35-36) From
Kris'âs'va there
was a son named Somadatta. By worshiping the best one of all, the Lord
of all Praises, the Original Person [Vishnu]
in an as'vamedha sacrifice, he achieved the
supreme destination where all the masters of yoga have their refuge. A son of Somadatta named Sumati thereupon
begot a son called
Janamejaya. All these kings of Vais'âlî sustained the reputation of King Trinabindu.'

read full book here

MANU AND THE CONNECTIONS

Man : whence, how and whither : a record of clairvoyant investigation

Man : whence, how and whither : a record of clairvoyant investigation
by
Besant, Annie Wood, 1847-1933

Man : whence, how and whither : a record of clairvoyant investigation
by
Besant, Annie Wood, 1847-1933

THE CIVILIZATION OF ATLANTIS A CONNECTION WITH MANU THE KING

THE BUILDING OF THE GREAT CITY

THE SECOND SUB-RACE, THE ARABIAN

Publication date 1913 Topics Theosophy, Clairvoyance, Reincarnation Publisher Madras, India : Theosophical Pub. House Collection university_of_illinois_urbana-champaign; americana Digitizing sponsor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates Contributor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Language English