We are a Teenager of the Meena Tribe, and we proud of our culture and we respect our "samaj". We have some questions.
1.Why we don't know about our history?
2.Why Our Tribe was treated as a criminal Tribe?
3.Why some People hate Us (specially, when they know that we are From ST ).
4.Why our parents don't give freedom whether it is Boy/Girl ( As compared to other Guys).
Thanks to God for giving us the best Parents. But, why they don't want their children as an Owner of the Company, As a Musician
In ancient times (till 10th Century) North of India was mainly ruled by clans of Chauhans. Chanda ( a clan of Zamindar Mina) is one of the branch from Chauhans. Chandas were ruling Khoganw (Now part of Jaipur) and were head of confederation of Meenakingdoms then [1]. Khoganw was the last kingdom which was overtaken by Kachwaha. Most of the Chanda history has been distorted by later rulers of the region.
However, according to the records maintained by Jagas of Rajasthan for Chanda clan, reveals past history about Chanda clan and Kingdoms. As per Jagas, Chanda Meenas are Agnivanshis and a sub clan of Chauhans.
The son of the king Prathvi Raj of Delhi was married to the daughter of the king Alan Singh Chanda [5]. This also reveals the link between Chandas and Chauhans. Other interesting fact, Chauhan claim to be descended from Dhundhar and historically before Kachwahas it was ruled by dynasty of Chanda Meenas (approximately till 10th c.).
NOTE: Jaga is a caste in Rajasthan, who hereditarily keeps the genealogical records of Meenas.
Alan Singh Chanda
According to Tod the Meena King Raja Ralun singh also known as Alan Singh Chanda of Khoganw [2, 3, 4] kind-heartedly adopted a stranded Rajput mother and her child who sought refuge in his realm. Later, the Meena king sent the child, Dhola Rae, to Delhi to represent the Meena kingdom. The Rajput, in gratitude for these favours, returned with Rajput conspirers and massacred the weaponless Meenas on Diwali while performing rituals i.e PitraTrapan , it is customary in the Meenas to be weaponless at the time of PitraTrapan , "filling the reservoirs in which the Meenas bathed with their dead bodies" [Tod.II.281] and thus conquered Khoganw.This act of Kachwaha Rajputs was termed as most coward and shameful in history of Rajasthan.
He then subjugated the Sihra Gotra of Meenas at much later on known as Jamwa Ramgarh near Jaipur, and transferred his capital thence. Becoming the son-in-law of the prince of Ajmer, he died when battling 11,000 Meenas,most of whom he slew[Tod.II.282]. His son Maidul Rae "made a conquest of Amber from the Soosawut Meenas" whose King was the head of the Meena confederation. He subdued the Nandla Meenas, annexing the Gatoor-Gatti district [Tod.II.282]. Hoondeo succeeded to the throne and "continued the warfare against the Meenas" [Tod.II.282]. Koontal, his successor, fought the Meenas "in which the Meenas were defeated with great slaughter, which secured his rule throughout Dhundhar" [Tod.II.282]. The Meenas were the original builders of Amber, which town they consecrated to Amba, the Mother Goddess, whom they knew as "Gatta Rani" or "Queen of the Pass" [Tod.II.282].
References
A History of Jaipur 1503-1938 by Jadunath Sarkar, edited by Raghubir Singh Published 1994, Orient Longman, ISBN 8125003339
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan", by James Tod
The Central and Western Rajpoot States of India, James Tod, ISBN 81-7167-366
'India, its people and their secular state' By Ram Gopal, Published 1987 Criterion Publications India, 460 pages, Original from the University of Michigan.
NOTE: The books [1, 3, 4] are strictly written and carved with the influence of Royal family of Jaipur. However, it is makes interesting reading.Categories:
The two tribes were evidently a primitive race which was spread over the whole of India, as they are still found in large numbers in Kajputana and Guzarat, where they are known as Bhils and Meenas, and in the Canarese country, where they are called Billavar.
Villavar
Villavars were the primary rulers among the Dravidians who once ruled the whole of India.
Villavars(Bowmen) were archers who once emerged from the hunting clans of India. They were also known as Ezhinar or Eyinars in Chera(Present day Kerala) and Tamil countries respectively. The Bhil tribals, The Billavas of Tulunadu of Karnataka, The Villavar Clans of Kerala who founded the Chera Kingdom all are Villavars. The Ezhavas or Illavas of Kerala are also descendents of this Villavar tribe of Kerala. The Villavars of Kerala and Illavars of Sri Lanka after whom Eeelam or Heladipa is named were relatives. Alwar, Alvar, Aluvar or Alva are the titles shared by all the Villavar tribes.
Villavar was a tribe of hunters living in the southern part of ancient India. The word villavar derives from the Dravidian word for bow (vil). The villvars lived in hill tracts and forests; [1]. Chera kings used the title villavan[2][3]
The oldest of tribes who dwelt in Tamilakam were the Villavar and Minavar. The • Villavar or bowmen (from the Dravidian word ml meaning a bow) inhabited hilly tracts and jungles, and lived by the chase; and the Minavar or fishermen (from the Dravidian meen, a fish) subsisted by fishing and resided in the valleys and plains, or on the sea-coast. The two tribes were evidently a primitive race which was spread over the whole of India, as they are still found in large numbers in Kajputana and Guzarat, where they are known as Bhils and Meenas, and in the Canarese country, where they are called Billavar.
These semi-barbarous tribes were conquered by the Nagas, who were a very numerous and civilised race, and who at one time or other ruled a great portion of India, Ceylon and Burma. They are mentioned in the Bamayana, and the Naga capital, which probably lay in the heart of the Dekkan is described in that epic as follows:—
Near Bhogavati stands the place Where dwell the hosts of the serpent race,
A broad-wayed city walled and barred Which watchful legions keep and guard.
The fiercest of the serpent youth Each awful for his venomed tooth ;
And throned in his imperial hall Is Vasuki who rules them all.
Explore the serpent city well,
Search town and tower and citadel,
Scan each field and wood that lies Around it with your watchful eyes.
From the Maliabharata we learn that there were Naga kingdoms between the Jumna and the Ganges about the 13th century B. C. When the kings of the Lunar race of Aryas wanted to found a second capital near the spot where Delhi stands at present, they had to dislodge the Nagas who occupied
1. Griffith's Bamayana IV, 205. Indian Antiquary, Vol. VIII. p. 5.
40
The Tamils Eighteen Hundred Years Ago
it. Arjuna, the hero of the poem, in his banishment is said to have married first Ulipi, the daughter of a Naga king, then Chitrangadai, daughter of Chitravahana, the Naga king of Manipura. Parikshit, the grand son of Arjuna was killed by Thakshaka, a Naga king, and hence Janamejaya, the son of Parikshit had to wage a long and bloody war with the Nagas and killed thousands of them. They appear again in history in the 6th century B. C. When a Naga dynasty ruled Magadha ; and it was during the reign of Ajatasatru, the 6th king of this race, that Gautama Buddha preached his new faith which soon found favour with the Nagas. 1 The Ceylonese historical works all begin with an account of the Nagas. It appears from these works that in the 6th century B. C. there were powerful Naga king¬ doms on the western coast of the island which was called Nagadwipa or Naga island on that account. The Naga capital was at Kalyani. The niece of the king of Kalyani was married to a Naga king of the Kanawaddamano mountain, which was evidently Kandamadanam, a hill near the modern Ramesvaram on the Indian coast, opposite to Kalyani. In the ancient sculp¬ tures at Amaravati and elsewhere which were executed more than eighteen hundred years ago, the human figures, which are represented with serpent hoods spread wide at the back of them, are Nagas. 2 Some fragments of the sculptures which were removed from the ruins at Amaravati may now be seen at the Government Museum, Madras. In these sculptures the Naga kings are distinguished by the hood of a five or seven-headed serpent at their back, Naga princesses by a three-headed serpent, and ordinary Nagas by a single-headed serpent. The artists who executed these sculptures with considerable labour and care seem to have imagined that the Nagas partook of the nature of serpents, and that their bodies were partly human and partly serpentine. The ancient Tamil poets appear to have shared this belief, for, they speak of the Nagas who were contemporary with them, as human beings, while at the same time they describe the ancient Nagas as serpents living underground. In describing the antiquity and wealth of Kaviripaddinam, the Chola capital, the author of the Chillappathikaram states that it was an ancient
THE NAGA TRIBE, FROM NAGALAND, PLACE DEAD ANCESTORS SKULLS IN SHRINES.
The aboriginal Villavar and Minavar appear to have had no gods. The Nagas who first conquered the aboriginal races, which inhabited the Tamil country, worshipped the dread goddess K&li and sacrificed many a buffalo at her shrines. The image of KAli was decked in a most frightful manner. Her matted hair was tied up like a crown on her head, with the shining skin, •of a young cobra : the curved tusk of a boar was fastened in her hair to resemble the crescent. A string of tiger’s teeth served as a necklace on her shoulders. The striped skin of a tiger was wound round her waist like a garment. A strong bow bent ^tnd ready to shoot was placed in her hand; and she was
Vaivasvata, also known as Sraddhadeva or Satyavrata or MANU , was the king of Dravida before the great flood
Dravida is mentioned as one of the kingdoms in the southern part of present-day mainland India during the time of the Mahabharata. Sometimes the name Dravida was used to denote all the southern kingdoms (like the Chera, Pandya and Chola kingdoms) collectively[
The king of Dravida Kingdom ?
The origin of Dravida
Mahabharata links the origin of Dravidas with sage Vasistha. Viswamitra, a king in the Ikshwaku clan, attacked the cow of Vasistha. Then many armies emerged for the protection of that cow and they attacked the armies of Viswamitra. Cow symbolizes land, in ancient Indian scriptures. Thus this war was fought with the countries allied with Vasistha.Other kingdoms that were mentioned along with the Dravidas in this incident were Sakas, Yavanas, Savaras, Kanchis, Paundras and Kiratas, Nishada, Yavanas and Sinhalas, and the barbarous kingdoms of Khasas, Chivukas, Pulindas, ChinasHunas with Keralas, Mlechchhas, etc.THE JANAPATHAS AND KINGDOMS OF SOUTH INDIA There are many Janapathas and kingdoms in the southern region of India, referred to in the Mahabharata. Most of these Janapadas are named after the community inhabiting them or vice versa. Some purar:ias, like the Matsya and the Vayu, rightly consider the Narmada and Mahanadi axis as the dividing line between Northern and Southern India and include the Tapti basin within the Southern region. Tittirah These people, mentioned in the Mahabharata, are found in the army of Yuddhisthar along with many north-western tribes. According to Shefer, on the evidence of Matsya puran, they are a Dravidian people of the region adjacent to the Chola and Pandays terntones. Reference P225 shodhganga ch5
In religio-mythology, Abraham and Brahma, aka the “Abraham/Brahma motif” (Goodman, 1994), Brahma and Abraham, or Abraham = Brahma (Ѻ), refers to multiply overlapping parallels between the Hebrew patriarch figure Abraham (500BC) and the Hindu creator god Brahma (900BC), and their respective wife-sisters Sarah and Saraswati (see: Sarah and Saraswati); both sets of which derive from the older Egyptian astro-theology coupling of Ra/Sirius (c.3500BC), i.e. Sun-Star based theology
A diagram of the Abraham and Brahma connection from a chapter of Libb Thims' Zerotheism for Kids (2016), explaining how Abraham and Brahma, and Sarah and Saraswati, are not real people (nor gods), but anthropomorphism of an ancient astro-theological belief of the connection of the sighting of helical rising of Sirius, the start of the annual Nile River flood, and the re-powering of the sun. [13]
Abraham & Brahma | pre-Rosetta Stone era
In c.1000 to 500BC, it was known that Jewish priests were of Egyptian origin; for example:
“The ‘Choens’ [Cohens] (Ѻ) are most senior Egyptian priest-teachers.”
Hence, it would have been known that the fictional prophet "Abraham" would be of Egyptian origin, in derivation. In the years to follow, however, with the decline of the Egyptian Empire
The Egyptian language and religion became less well known; accordingly scholars began to attribute Abraham to an Indian origin; for example:-
“ ‘This man’, answered Aristotle, ‘was by birth a Jew, and came from Celesyria; these Jews are descended from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians Calani’.”
Accordingly, in the years c.500BC to 1820s, prior to the making (189BC), later discovery (1799), and translation (1820) of the famed tri-lingual Rosetta stone, the key to understanding Egyptian hieroglyphics, and theological system, of the Egyptians, this language conveys, decoded in preliminary form dissection (1840s-1870s), then later in more refined form (1910s-1920s), there was no way for an intelligent person, e.g. Voltaire or Kant, to be able to discern that Hinduism (900BC) and Judaism (500BC) are both derived from ancient Egyptian religio-mythology (3100BC), itself based an ancient astro-theology. Accordingly, thinkers in this general era, if they noticed Abraham = Brahma connection, generally had no choice, per reason of lack of better data, but to conclude that Abraham derived from the Brahma model of the Hindus. This is what we call the "pre-Rosetta Stone era". In the "post-Rosetta Stone era", in the late 19th century (c.1870s-present), it became clear that both Abraham and Brahma were independently copied from the older Sun-Sirius + Nile River flood theological cyclical model, which turned Ra-Isis + Nun god model, which morphed into the reincarnation-based Hindu version and the resurrection based Jewish-Christian-Islam version, respectively.
The following are pre-Rosetta Stone era, i.e. before 1870s, related Abraham and Brahma connecting quotes, made in the period when Egyptian hieroglyphics were either not yet understood (pre 1820s), or there meaning was just beginning to be disseminated (1840s-1870s):
“‘Abraham’ and his wife ‘Sarah’ are derived from ‘Brahma’ and his wife ‘Saraswati’.”
People from this camp, in short, will tend to argue that Judaism was copied from Hinduism and the Jewish priests originally Indian priests, which is an incorrect view.
“The names Abram and Brahma are equivalent in numerical value.” — Charles King (1864), The Gnostics and Their Remains, Ancient and Mediaeval (pg. 13)
Abraham, Brahma & Ra | post-Rosetta Stone era
The following are post-Rosetta Stone era, i.e. after 1870s, related Abraham and Brahma connecting quotes, during which time it began to become apparent that Ra (sun) and Isis (Sirius), sun-star based Egyptian mythology (3100BC), rooted ancient astro-theology (3500BC), predates both Babylonian mythology (2300BC), Persian mythology (1100BC), Hindu mythology (c.900BC), and Hebrew mythology, therein being the determinate original source of the Brahma/Saraswati, Abraham/Sarah commonalities:
A 1912 etymology of Abraham, as "father Ra, born of earth, at is fire city", by American comparative mythologist Wakeman Ryno, who is explicitly defined as a solar-astrological based fictional character. [2]
“The fire-god of Ur was Ab-Ram. The Hebrew world ‘Ab’ means ‘father’, and Ram (head sign of the Zodiac) means ‘most high’. Ab-Ram and Is-Ra-El were names of Saturn.”
— Samuel Dunlap (1858), Vestiges of theSpirit History of Man; cited by Hilton Hotema (1956)[6]
“So Ab, the original, Ram, or due east point, the orient, or origin of all light, or Braam of Sanscrit, by disguising its true meaning and mystifying the multitude by inserting at the proper place this H converted Abraam into Ab-ra-ham, or Ab, the first, original,Ra, the father or sun god, and Ham the Egyptian founder; or God the father of Ham.”
— Karl Anderson (1892), The Astrology of the Old Testament [1]
“Here Adam and Eve (Earth and Sky, Sibu and Nuit) mourned their first born Abel (summer), who had been killed by his brother Cain (lance). with the lance-like frosts of win-ter. Here Abraham (Ab-RA-Ham, father Ra at his Fire-City) mourned his father Terah (Earth). Here is where the God Saturnus mourned his mother Terra (Earth). Here is the dark abyss of Tartarus where Cronus receives his scythe. Here is the Ur of Chaldees, where Old Father Time cuts off the year with his sickle.”
In 1956, Hilton Hotema, in his Ancient Sun God, building on Samuel Dunlap (1858), devoted an entire chapter to “Ab-Ram the Sun-God”; a synopsis his views from one of his later books is as follows:
“The story of Abraham is a myth. Abraham himself is a myth. It was usual with the Old Arabians to regard Satum and Abram as their progenitor, and while looking upon Saturn as their father ... He was a child named Ab-ram, and this name is later changed to Ab-ra-ham. Charles King in his work, The Gnostics, states that the words "brahma" and "abrahrn" have the same numerical value. When we run this ‘allegory’ down, we discover that Abram (Abraham) is just another myth of the sun
— Hilton Hotema (1963), The Secret of Regeneration [3]
The following are post-Rosetta Stone era etymologies, making the Brahma = Abraham connection, but remaining ignorant as to the older "father Ra born of Keme" following the annual 150-day Nile River flood marked by the helical rising of Sirius (Sarah/Saraswati) etymology:
“Abram is but the Hindu Brama, with a as prefix instead of suffix; and Brama was the original name of the Hindu creator. Later the letter h was added, thus making it Brahma. The letter h signifies life, and thus did Brama, Abram, and Sarai in due time receive life, or being, which implies that in the beginning they did not have it.”
— Lloyd Graham (1975), Deceptions and Myths of the Bible [4]
“There are certain striking similarities between the Hindu god Brahma and his consort Saraisvati, and the Jewish Abraham and Sarai, that are more than mere coincidences.” — Gene Matlock (c.2002), “Who Was Abraham?”[9]
“The similarities between Abraham and Brahma have not gone unnoticed. Abraham is said to be the father of the Jews, and Brahma, as the first created being, is often seen as the father of mankind. Abraham’s name is derived from the two Semitic words ab meaning ‘father’ and raam/raham meaning ‘of the exalted….’ We might also note that the name of Brahma’s consort Sarasvati seems to resonate with that of Abraham’s wife, Sarah [… each one’s identity as a wife and/or sister]. Also, in India, the Sarasvati River includes a tributary known as the Ghaggar…. According to Jewish tradition, Hagar was Sarah’s maidservant…. Both Brahmins … and Jews see themselves as the ‘chosen people of God.’ The Hebrews began their sojourn through history as a ‘kingdom of priests’ (Exodus 19:6). Likewise, Brahmins are also a community of priests. ” — Steven Rosen (2006), Essential Hinduism [5]
“Brahma, the Hindu God of Creation, is Abraham. Sarasvati, the Hindu Goddess of knowledge and wisdom and consort to Brahma, is Sarah, Abraham's wife. I first came across the idea that Abraham and Brahma might be connected around 1999 but can't remember exactly where I saw it other than remembering doing an internet search on something and coming up with a site with this information. The site I think also connected Hammarabi to Abraham to Brahma as all variants of the same person. In Hebrew, the names for Brahma and Abraham would be written the same way: BRHM, with the vowels excluded. But Krishna sounds and looks like Christ, so what of the similarity? And I put this information on my mental back burner until debating with Muslims on internet talkboards several years later and again ran across another Abraham-Brahma connection checking out some Hindu Vedic sites countering Islamic doctrines. Abraham is the Brahma of the South. The Brahma of Egypt, the Black Brahma. The Saturn Brahma. Osiris is the Sun Brahma. Hindu Vedic merchants were trading spices heavily with Egypt and Canaan through the Yemen-Sabeans who are linguistically and culturally connected to Canaanite Hebrews. At some point ancient Hebrews picked up both Egyptian royalty racism and Vedic Brahmin ideas such as the whole "Priests of God" racial prejudice against Gentiles seen as inferior human beings just as Brahmins considered other castes less than themselves. The End of Abraham chapter tells more about how Jewish authors plagiarized Hindu Vedic religious personages, Brahma and Sarasvati, to create Abraham and Sarah.” — Stephen Lewis (2007), Biomystical Christianity [7]
References 1. Anderson, Karl. (1892). The Astrology of the Old Testament: Lost World Regained (pg. 10). Health Research Books, 1996. 2. Ryno, Wakeman. (1912). “Comparative Mythology” (Ѻ), The American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal, 34:41-46. 3. Hotema, Hilton. (1963). The Secret of Regeneration (§: Allegory of Abram (Abraham), pgs. 136-37). Health Research Books, 1998. 4. Graham, Lloyd M. (1975). Deceptions and Myths of the Bible (pg. 113). Citadel Press Books. 5. (a) Rosen, Steven. (2006). Essential Hinduism (pg. 12). Greenwood Publishing Group. (b) Murdock, Dorothy. (2009). The Gospel According to Acharya S (pg. 70). Stellar House Publishing. (c) Rainbow Warrior. (2014). “Brahma and Abraham: Divine Covenants of a Common Origin” (Ѻ), Academia.edu. 6. (a) Dunlap, Samuel F. (1858). Vestiges of the Spirit History of Man(Ra, 19+ pgs; Brahma, 24+ pgs; Abraham, 15+ pgs; Ab-Ram, 7+ pgs). Publisher. (b) Hotema, Hilton. (1956). Ancient Sun God (pg. 26). Publisher. 7. Lewis, Stephen. (2007). Biomystical Christianity (bio; Egyptian Connection; End of Abraham). BioMystic.org. 8. (a) Doreste, Tomas. (1998). Moisés y los Extraterrestres. Group Edit. Planeta. (b) Matlock, Gene. (c.2002). “Who Was Abraham?”(Ѻ). Hermetics.org. 9. Matlock, Gene. (c.2002). “Who Was Abraham?”(Ѻ). Hermetics.org. 10. (a) Postel, Guillaume. (1552). Abrahami patriarchae liber Jezirah. Publisher. (b) Robertson, John. (1889), Christ and Krishna (pg. 6). Publisher. (c) Bouwsma, William J. (1957). Concordia Mundi: the Career and Thought of Guillaume Postel (1510-81) (pg. 61). Harvard University Press. (d) Goodman, Hananya. (1994). Between Jerusalem and Benares: Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism (pg. 270). SUNY Press, 2012. 11. Goodman, Hananya. (1994). Between Jerusalem and Benares: Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism (pg. 4). SUNY Press, 2012. 12. (a) Poliakov, Leon. (1974). The Aryan Myth (translator: Edmund Howard)(pg.186). Basic Books. (b) Goodman, Hananya. (1994). Between Jerusalem and Benares: Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism (pg. 270). SUNY Press, 2012. (c) Cowan, Robert. (2010). The Indo-German Identification: Reconciling South Asian Origins and European Destines, 1765-1885 (pg. 52). Camden House. (d) Agarwai, M.K. (2013). The Vedic Core of Human History (pg. 322). iUniverse. 13. Thims, Libb. (2016). Smart Atheism: For Kids (pdf | 309-pgs). Publisher. 14. Pliny (the Elder). (77AD). Natural History, Volume 1(translators: John Bostock and H.T. Riley) (pg. 67). Henry G. Bohn, 1855. 15. Gordon, J.S. (2011). Land of the Fallen Star Gods: the Celestial Origins of Ancient Egypt (pg. #). Inner Traditions.
Further reading ● Rainbow Warrior. (2014). “Brahma and Abraham: Divine Covenants of a Common Origin” (Ѻ), Academia.edu.
The Sun formed from the gravitational collapse of a region within a large molecular cloud. Most of the matter gathered in the center (Sun), while the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune).Sun was about 70% as bright as today.Our solar system is currently orbiting at around 24,000–26,000 light-years from the galactic center of the Milky Way, completing one orbit in about 225–250 million years.The distance of the Sun from Earth is approximately 149.6-million kilometers. At this average distance, light travels from the Sun to Earth in about 8 minutes and 19 seconds.
Formation Of Universe
Detailed study about Ancient Ancestro's Ancestor , How they became human and then God ,
NOW See how Earth Became inhabitant For God and Human
Homo sapiens is the only extant human species. The name is Latin for "wiseman"
SAGES - WISE MAN Ancient Ancestors Title
The Seven Sages or Seven Wise Men , was the title For seven philosophers, statesmen, and law-givers of the 6th century BC who were renowned for their wisdom.
wise men is used for sages , because sages are those who discover and give the knowledge to human like economy , finance , math , language , vedas , etc
THE living Homo sapiens IS "AKHA" Thailand ,The Akha are an ethnic group who live in small villages at higher elevations in the mountains of Thailand
A Burmese depiction of the Akha in the early 1900s
Female Homo erectus , one of the first trulyhuman Ancient ancestors of modern humans.
Forensic reconstruction of an adult male Homo erectus.
Origin and dispersal
The Narmada fossil, discovered in 1982 in Madhya Pradesh, India, was at first suggested as H. erectus (Homo erectus narmadensis) but later recognized as Homo sapiens.[112]
A diorama showing Homo erectus, the earliest human species that is known to have controlled fire
The control of fire by early humans was a turning point in the cultural aspect of human evolution. Fire provided a source of warmth, protection, a way to create more advanced hunting tools, and a method for cooking food. These cultural advances allowed human geographic dispersal, cultural innovations, and changes to diet and behavior. Additionally, creating fire allowed human activity to continue into the dark and colder hours of the evening.
NOW,
Homo erectus use fire and this is a revolutionary invention of human , now H. erectus start Migration and that's how the first GOD is Created called The SUN or surya , fire , agni devi , energy , positive vibes , and all , H.erectus use fires to protect humans from wild animals and they cook food for those human who didn't know about fire and hence they give the title of GOD (g) discovery of fire is a man , society make him GOD .
The ancestors of Lord Ram : are described below according to Vishnu Purana and Valmiki Ramayana. The famous personalities of Suryavansha as per Vishnu Purana, Valmiki Ramayana, Ramakatha Rasavahini and Raghuvansha Charitram are Ikshvaku(son of manu ), Vikukshi, Kakusta, etc. The city of Kosala and Ayodhya was founded by Manu (earliest Prajapathi) and by his son Ikshvaku whose descendant was Ram.
from the information and data we can say that the king of the dravida kingdom is MANU (shraddhadeva , satyavrata, vavivasvata manu) and his son IKSHVAKU whose descendant was RAM.
let's go through some more facts and info
As it's clearly show that rama and ikshvaku had a connection , Genealogy connection which clearify that rama is Dravidian not aryan
